RLUK_Mike: That's all folks! Thanks v. much 2 Michael Emly & Alison Faraday, & all our speakers today (especially given the train situation!) #rluksafe
Follow Us On Twitter
RLUK_Mike: David Prosser - other major themes, adapting the #UKRR for monographs, addressing a digital surrogate register for the UK #rluksafe
RLUK_Mike: RT @speccollbrad: Hard at work on #rluk #oclc survey - I'm commenting on #borndigital bit - well, I like a challenge!
RLUK_Mike: David Prosser: some key themes - the necessity not just the choice of collaboration; advocacy; evidence (metadata & case studies) #rluksafe
RLUK_Mike: Would a next generation solution be 2 rapidly digitize title pages & use visual pattern recognition 2 deduplicate our collections? #rluksafe
RLUK_Mike: How should we take the #rluksafe work forward: can we expect a top-down model or are we the community the likely operative force here?
The RLUK Newsletter
Contact Details
RLUK Office
Maughan Library and Information Services Centre
King's College London
Chancery Lane
London
WC2A 1LR
Telephone: 02078482737
Email: mike.mertens@rluk.ac.uk
Popular content
Survey of Outstanding Material for Cataloguing in CURL Libraries
In order to prepare the ground for future funding bids for both retroconversion and retrospective cataloguing of outstanding research material collections in CURL Libraries after RSLP, a survey was conducted to map such remaining material across the Consortium. The survey will be updated on a continual and regular basis.
Following RSLP, CURL Members were asked to take stock and look again at what remained to be done in their institutions in terms of retrospective conversion (i.e. automation of manual catalogues) and retrospective cataloguing (i.e. electronic cataloguing of un-catalogued material) after July 03. The date of July 03 was chosen on the grounds that some CURL libraries would be using some of their 2002-03 RSLP Access money for this work. The purpose of the survey was to identify the extent and nature of the outstanding material across the Consortium with a view to exploring the possibility of seeking further funding collaboratively, in particular, in co-operation with Full Disclosure.
Members were asked to provide the following information:
Number of items
Subject areas and name of collections, if relevant
Date range
Languages
Format
Importance of the material for research
Members were asked not to include archival collections, as this is an area that is being handled by the Archives Hub.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| See the Final Report, produced in April 04 (DOC) | 1.53 MB |
- Login to post comments


