Funding consultant to develop and deliver a Research Engagement Programme for academic and research libraries

​​Commissioned by Research Libraries UK in partnership with the Arts and Humanities Research Council

Issue Date: Wednesday 20 October 2021

Deadline for Response: noon Friday 26 November 2021

Interviews and presentations: Tuesday 14 and Wednesday 15 December 2021

Maximum commissioned budget: £10,000 (exc. VAT)

Project duration: January-December 2022 (inclusive of programme development and delivery)

Download the ITT as a PDF

Introduction and context

Research Libraries UK, in partnership with the AHRC, wishes to appoint a highly experienced individual(s) to deliver a series of bespoke training sessions as part of a forthcoming Research Engagement Programme for academic and research libraries.

The training programme will be delivered across the Spring-Winter of 2022, and will explore how colleagues working within research and academic libraries can envisage, develop, and submit highly-competitive funding applications to academic and research funders. It should provide participants with an overview of the academic funding landscape, offer a tailored programme of events, activities, coaching and mentoring opportunities to guide them through making a funding application, and enable them to share this knowledge with the wider library community (via taking a “train-the-trainer” approach).

This programme is a direct response to the findings of a collaborative scoping study, commissioned by RLUK in partnership with the AHRC, and undertaken by research consultancy, Evidence Base, across January-June 2021. The scoping study explored the role, and potential role, of research and academic libraries as partners in, and leaders of, academic and scholarly research. This included colleagues working across a wide variety of professions and disciplines. The scoping study made a series of far reaching recommendations, including the need for direct investment in the research capacity and capabilities of libraries. This scheme is a direct response to this recommendation. 

The full report, its findings, and recommendations can be viewed here.

About Research Libraries UK

Research Libraries UK (RLUK) will be the client for this project. RLUK is a consortium of 37 of the UK and Ireland’s leading research libraries whose purpose is to shape the research library agenda and contribute to the wider knowledge economy through innovative projects and programmes.

RLUK is here to convene its 37 members around the issues that affect them, to represent their collective voice, to support them as they face shared challenges, and to be an effective advocate on their behalf. It is these four roles that define RLUK’s work and around which its membership offer is shaped. They enable RLUK to promote the research library community as a vibrant and integral element of the scholarly landscape.

RLUK wishes to actively support its members, and the wider library community, to expand their role as active and meaningful partners in, and pioneers of, academic and scholarly research. This programme is to be open to both RLUK and non-RLUK member institutions, and is to bring benefit to a broad cross-section of the academic and research library community.

Project Specification

The Research Engagement Programme will require the delivery of a tailored series of training sessions, activities, coaching and mentoring opportunities to a cohort of colleagues working across academic and research libraries who are interested in developing their research capacity and capabilities. The programme is to provide a step-by-step overview of the research development process for colleagues who, although interested in developing their research profile, have little or no experience of applying for research council funding. It should provide an overview of the research funding landscape, including funding available from a wide variety of funders such as UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme, and British Academy. The programme is to be delivered on a ‘train the trainer’ basis and those accepted onto the programme will be expected to share their acquired learning and expertise with members of the wider academic and research library community via blogs, presentations, and their contribution to training events. The ease with which attendees might share their learning with the wider community should be considered when designing the training sessions.

RLUK wishes to commission an individual(s) with considerable and demonstrable knowledge of the academic and research funding landscape, and the research process, to develop and deliver this training.

A budget of £10,000 (excluding VAT) is available for the design, development, and delivery of a cohort training programme to enhance the confidence and capability of colleagues working within research and academic libraries. This ITT relates to the design and delivery of a standalone programme in 2022. Depending on its success, this may become an annual programme.

The individual(s) appointed to undertake this work will be required to:

  • Design: and develop a tailored training programme for a cohort of academic and research library staff to develop their knowledge, skills, and confidence around making research funding applications.
  • Contents: Devise a programme that provides an overview of all aspects of the pre- and post-award process, including where to find funding, eligibility, formulating research questions, budgeting / full economic costings, and project reporting.
  • Format: Devise an engaging programme that utilises various learning techniques such as online workshops, events, external speakers, case studies, coaching, and mentoring opportunities. We envisage that the vast majority, if not all, of this programme will be virtual.
  • Engagement: Work closely with colleagues at RLUK and the AHRC regarding the contents of the training programme, its features, and outcomes ahead of its launch.
  • Delivery: Lead and deliver the training programme from Spring to Winter 2022.
  • Learning materials: To produce and supply participants with relevant learning materials including copies of presentations, crib sheets, and resources, which will aid their continued development beyond the programme itself.
  • Evaluation: Undertake a review of the programme, including individual sessions and its results, and deliverables as a whole.

As part of this ITT, we invite individual(s) to propose a structured cohort training programme based on the features above and outline how, based on their own experience and expertise, they would tailor these to a research and academic library audience. We invite suggestions regarding the size of the potential cohort and how participants within this programme might share their learning with the widest variety of colleagues. 

The proposed programme should enable participants to develop their:

  • Knowledge: of the research and academic funding landscape, including the funding opportunities available from a variety of funders to which academic and research library colleagues might apply including UKRI, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, and British Academy. The programme should provide details of the step-by-step process of developing a highly competitive application to a research funder and the various programmes and funds available. This should include the intellectual and procedural differences between being a Co-investigator and a Principal Investigator (PI).
  • Skills: as active partners and leaders of research, including how to formulate a research question, and develop an application for research funding. The programme should enable colleagues to develop their skills around project management, budgeting (including full economic costing), partnership formation, and impact. Cohort members should be guided through making a research funding application, from the initial research concept, to application submission and outcome, and to reflect on how these relate to their own research interests and professional practices. Cohort members should also receive an introduction to common project management techniques, the formation of contract and collaboration agreements, and the requirements of funder reporting, should funding be successful. They should also receive an overview of how best to repurpose the contents of an unsuccessful application. 
  • Confidence: as research funding applicants, including an understanding of common application pitfalls, and how they can position their own research and professional practice for the greatest impact in funding applications. This can include via completing worked examples and the use of best practice and successful case studies.
  • Advocacy: support cohort members to actively advocate for the role of academic and research libraries as partners in, and leaders of, research within their institutions and across the wider information and research communities.

Contractors should provide an overview of how these elements would feature in their proposed programme and any additional elements they would propose based on their own experience or expertise.

Key deliverables:

  • Key deliverable 1: A proposal for a tailored cohort training programme for colleagues working across academic and research libraries which fulfills the requirements of the project specification. This should include a programme outline, including a summary of its learning outcomes, key features, and a proposed cohort size. 
  • Key deliverable 2: The delivery of the cohort training programme across Spring-Winter 2022. The expectation is for the vast majority, if not all, of the programme to be delivered virtually.
  • Key deliverable 3: Collate detailed feedback from cohort participants and offer a high-level analysis of the key considerations or requirements to enable academic and research library staff to become active partners and leaders of academic research.

It is not envisaged that the appointed individual(s) will be responsible for the advertising and recruitment of the learning cohort, although there will be opportunities for them to feed into and inform this process. 

Members of the RLUK Executive will provide logistical support to the programme, including web-hosting of content and promotion. The individual(s) appointed will be expected to work closely with RLUK and AHRC in the creation, delivery, and evaluation of this programme throughout. 


Below is a draft timetable of the potential project milestones for the scoping study.

Invitation to tender published: Wednesday 20 October 2021
Deadline for responses: noon Friday 26 November 2021
Supplier interviews: Tuesday 14 and Wednesday 15 December 2021
Contract Award:  January 2022
Project Completion: Winter 2022/23


The maximum available budget for the delivery of this project is £10,000 (exc. VAT)

Evaluation Criteria

Tender submissions will be evaluated on a combination of your familiarity with the research funding landscape (50%),  familiarity and experience of working with libraries/information sector (30%), and quality of response (20%).


Please respond to this opportunity by:                                                                                                                                         

  • Project specification: Describing how you would meet the requirements described in the Project Specification including any additional approaches or methodologies you might utilise in order to guide a cohort of colleagues through the process of making a funding application to an academic funder.
  • Experience: Providing relevant evidence of your funding experience and expertise, including details of relevant projects successfully completed in the past 2 years. This should include your experience of working with the key project audiences.
  • Key deliverables: Provide an outline of how you will deliver the programme within the timeframe of the project.
  • Working practice and communication: Provide an outline of how you would ensure good communication and close working with RLUK throughout the project.
  • Cost: Providing a total price for you to deliver the project.

Key dates and contacts

Please submit your proposal to by noon Friday 26th November 2021. 

Please submit any clarification questions to